Employee Directors: A Step Towards Inclusive Corporate Governance

In recent years, the concept of employee directors, or, in other words, workers serving on the board of directors, has gained popularity in many countries of the west. Employee representation at the board level is not only a radical shift from the traditional shareholder-centric model but also a move towards a more inclusive, democratic, and transparent approach to business decision-making. But while this idea promises to strengthen the relationship between employers and employees, it also raises critical questions about its feasibility, fairness and impact on the company’s performance. In this article, we will discuss this concept, the relevant legal provisions, the pros and cons, and the way forward.

Composition of Board of Directors

Traditionally, corporate boards were composed of directors, whose primary responsibility was to maximize shareholder value. Many companies also had nominee directors and professional directors. The concept of independent directors (IDs) was introduced as part of corporate governance reforms aimed at improving transparency, accountability and oversight in companies. The timeline for the introduction of independent directors varies across countries, but it generally gained prominence in the late 20th century. For instance, in the UK, the concept of independent directors was brought to the fore by the Cadbury Committee Report on corporate governance in 1992. In the US the concept got significant attention in the wake of major corporate scandals like Enron and WorldCom; consequently, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandated public listed companies to have independent directors on their boards. Prior to this Act, having IDs in the Board was part of corporate best practice only. In India, the concept was introduced in 2000 by Clause 49 of the Listing Agreement that was implemented by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). In the European Union also, in the wake of major corporate scandals, the need for independent directors became a key aspect of corporate governance reform in the early 2000s. Similarly, in Australia, the role of IDs became more formalized with the release of the ASX Corporate Governance Council's Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best Practice Recommendations in 2003.

Employee directors

While the inclusion of independent directors helped drive transparency and efficiency, it has also been criticized for neglecting the interests of an important stakeholder, the employees. The idea behind employee directors was therefore introduced to bridge this gap, giving workers a voice in boardroom discussions and ensuring that their interests are directly represented at the highest levels of decision-making.

Employee directors can act as a bridge between the management and workmen and thereby help align the interests of both the parties. First, they bring an inside perspective to the board, providing valuable insights into the company's operational and cultural dynamics. Employees have a deep understanding of how company policies impact daily work life, and their involvement could lead to more thoughtful, balanced decisions that take into account long-term sustainability rather than short-term profit. Moreover, employee representation can enhance workplace morale and engagement. Having a representation on the board makes them feel empowered, and in turn, motivated, more productive and loyal. This often leads to lower turnover rates and a better organizational culture.

A proven model in many countries

Employee directors on boards is not a recent concept. In fact, many European countries have had worker participation in corporate governance for decades. However, the legal provisions governing employee directors vary significantly across countries, depending on their respective labour laws, corporate governance frameworks, and social models. In some nations, employee representation on corporate boards is mandated by law, while in others, it is voluntary or not practiced at all. Below is an overview of the legal provisions governing employee directors in a few countries:

Germany

Germany is one of the most prominent examples of mandatory employee representation on corporate boards, through a system known as Mitbestimmung (co-determination). As per the Co-Determination Act of 1976, in companies with over 2,000 employees, half of the supervisory board members must be employee representatives. This applies to all large companies, including public listed companies. For companies with 500–2,000 employees, one-third of the supervisory board is made up of employee representatives. These representatives are elected by the workforce and include both regular employees and union representatives. They have equal voting rights as the shareholder-appointed board members, although in the case of a tie, the chairman (a shareholder representative) has the casting vote.

France

In France, employee representation on corporate boards is legally required for large companies. As per the Loi Rebsamen (2015) and Pacte Law (2019), companies with over 1,000 employees in France or 5,000 globally must include at least two employee representatives on their boards of directors or supervisory boards. The precise number of employee representatives varies depending on the company’s size and internal governance structure, but generally, the threshold is two representatives for boards with more than eight members. Employee representatives are chosen either by the workers directly or via labour unions, depending on the company's internal rules. The aim of these laws is to ensure worker input in corporate governance, while also promoting social dialogue between employers and employees.

Sweden

Sweden has a well-established system of employee board representation as part of its broader tradition of labour market collaboration. Under the Board Representation (Private Sector Employees) Act of 1987, companies that have at least 25 employees, are required to have employee representatives on the board. Workers can appoint two representatives if the company has fewer than 1,000 employees, or three representatives if there are more than 1,000 employees. The employee board members have the same rights and responsibilities as other directors, though they are not involved in decisions related to collective bargaining agreements or labour disputes.

Denmark

In Denmark, employee representation on boards of directors is voluntary but becomes mandatory once employees opt for it. As per their Companies Act, companies with at least 35 employees must allow their workforce to elect representatives to the board of directors. Employees have the right to elect one-third of the board members, with a minimum of two seats. The threshold for electing these representatives is triggered when employees initiate the process through a formal vote. Employees elect representatives every four years, and these directors have the same rights and duties as other board members. Denmark’s system allows for flexibility, as employee representation is implemented only if the workforce expresses interest.

Norway

According to the Norwegian Public Limited Liability Companies Act, if a company has between 30 and 50 employees, employees can choose to have one board representative. Companies with more than 50 employees must have one-third of their board seats filled by employee-elected representatives, with a minimum of two representatives. Employee representatives are granted the same rights and responsibilities as other board members, but similar to Sweden, they are excluded from decisions concerning collective labour issues.

Finland

Finland's model provides for voluntary employee representation based on negotiations between employees and management. The Act on Personnel Representation in Company Administration, 1990 (which is now a part of the Co-operation Act of 2021) provides that in companies with over 150 employees, the latter may negotiate with the management to have their representative on the board. The number of representatives is determined through negotiations, and these representatives have the same voting rights and responsibilities as other directors.

Austria

Austria has a similar structure to Germany, with mandatory employee representation in large companies. The Austrian Labour Constitution Act (1974) provides that companies with over 300 employees must allocate one-third of supervisory board seats to employee representatives. These representatives are elected by the works council and have full voting rights, though they cannot vote on issues related to collective bargaining.

United Kingdom

The United Kingdom has no legal requirement for employee representation on boards, but there has been increasing discussion around corporate governance reform in this area. The new Corporate Governance Code of 2018 encourages large companies to engage more with their workforce. One option for doing this is to appoint an employee director, although this is not mandatory. Instead, companies can choose from several methods, such as creating a formal workforce advisory panel or designating a non-executive director to liaise with employees. Despite being voluntary, the Code reflects a growing awareness in the UK of the benefits of incorporating employee perspectives into corporate governance.

United States

In the United States, as of now, there are no legal mandates for employee representation on corporate boards. Corporate governance in the US is typically shareholder-centric, with directors primarily accountable to shareholders. However, there has been some discussion about the potential for employee ownership models, such as Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs), which give employees a stake in the company, though this does not translate into formal board representation in most cases.

Japan

In Japan, as such there is no legal mandate for employee representation on board. However, the Japanese corporate culture often involves close consultation with employees through unions and work councils. The Japanese system emphasizes consensus-building and lifetime employment, which fosters strong relationships between management and workers, though it does not involve formal board representation.

The position in India

In India, the concept of employee directors is still relatively underdeveloped compared to European countries where mandatory worker participation on boards is more common. However, Indian corporate governance is evolving, and there are some frameworks and discussions around employee representation in the board.

Legal Framework

India’s corporate governance system is traditionally shareholder-centric, with boards primarily representing the interests of shareholders rather than employees. The Companies Act, 2013 does not mandate the inclusion of employee representatives on the boards. However, there are provisions under labour laws and sector-specific regulations that offer certain forms of worker representation in corporate governance. The following paragraphs contain brief discussion on the same:

i. Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs)  

In India, the PSUs have had a long-standing practice of having employee representatives in governance. In many PSUs, the government has allowed employees to be elected to the board, representing their interests alongside other directors. As per the Department of Public Enterprises (DPE) guidelines, workers’ participation in decision-making is encouraged. Employee representatives can be part of the board in a non-executive capacity, usually representing trade unions or employee welfare organizations.

ii. Trade Unions and Workers’ Participation

The Indian labour laws encourage workers' participation in management. In large organizations with active trade unions, there is often indirect influence on company policies through worker participation mechanisms like joint management councils and work committees, although these are typically consultative bodies and not formal board membership.

iii. Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs)

Though definitely not a substitute for employee directors, Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs) in India allow employees to have a stake in the company by owning shares. Some companies with active ESOPs involve employees in decision-making to a certain degree. This concept empowers employees economically, but it does not grant them formal representation on the board.

iv. Workers' Representation under the National Labour Codes

India is all set to have four new labour codes, vi., the Code on Social Security 2020, the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code 2020, the Industrial Relations Code 2020, and the Code on Wages 2019, that will together consolidate the existing 29 central labour and industrial laws. The idea is to avoid multiplicity of laws. As part of these ongoing labour reforms, there is increasing emphasis on worker representation at various levels of governance, however, there is no provision yet for employee directors.

v. Voluntary Practices in Private Companies

In India’s private sector, there are instances where companies with a focus on worker-friendly policies are increasingly recognizing the importance of including employees in decision-making processes, but they tend to use advisory councils or employee committees, rather than appointing employees as formal board members.

Challenges of employee representation in Board

While the concept of employee directors definitely has its merits from the perspective of corporate governance, it also comes with significant challenges, especially in countries with shareholder-centric corporate law frameworks. The following are the main challenges:

(i)  Conflict of interest: It would be a challenge for employee directors to prioritize the interests of their fellow workers over the broader goals of the company.

(ii)  Level of competence: Serving on a board of directors requires specialized knowledge of corporate finance, strategy and risk management. For meaningful contribution to board discussions employees are expected to master these skill sets, which may be difficult.

(iii) Supremacy of Labour Unions in certain sectors: In India, labour unions are quite powerful in sectors like manufacturing, but their interest is more on collective bargaining and labour rights than on any board representation.

(iv) Choosing the right representative: A large, diversified company has thousands of employees in its various departments, with various skillsets, and different priorities. Choosing the right representative to properly represent the interests of all workers is a very difficult task.

(v)  Promoter-controlled companies: In country with predominance of family-owned businesses, where decision-making is concentrated in the hands of a few key stakeholders, inclusion of employees at the board level is a difficult proposition.

(vi) Top-down approach and resistance to change: In India, the corporate world generally follows a top-down governance model and broader stakeholder participation will be met with extreme resistance to change.

Conditions for success of Employee Directorship

For companies considering the inclusion of employee directors, several key factors must be addressed to ensure success.

First, clear structures and guidelines must be established to define the role of employee directors, their responsibilities, and their scope of influence. There must be a balance between the enhanced voice of employees and the board's ability to act in the company's best interest.

Second, there must be training and mentorship of employees to ensure that the employee representatives have the necessary skills and knowledge to contribute effectively.

Third, there must be regular communication between employee directors and the employees to ensure that the former understand the concerns of the latter and represent their views accurately, rather than compromise the same.

And fourth, the employee directors must maintain confidentiality when participating in sensitive board discussions.

Way Forward

The concept of employee directors is part of a broader movement towards more inclusive and stakeholder-oriented corporate governance. As businesses face increasing pressure to address issues like inequality, environmental sustainability and social responsibility, the inclusion of employee voices in boardrooms could be a powerful tool for driving positive change. By involving employees in decision-making processes, companies can foster a culture of collaboration, trust and accountability, thereby leading to more sustainable and equitable business practices. Employee directors are already a key feature of corporate governance in many European countries, where laws mandate or encourage worker participation at the highest levels of decision-making. The trend towards more inclusive corporate governance, particularly in Europe, reflects a growing recognition that employee involvement can contribute to more balanced and sustainable corporate decision-making.

In India, the concept of employee directors remains at a nascent stage. While there are no concrete legal mandates for employee directors in India, the changing corporate governance norms and labour reforms could encourage a shift towards greater worker participation in decision-making. In future, it is possible that India could adopt more structured approaches to employee representation, especially in light of growing discussions on labour rights, equality, and corporate responsibility. As the country continues to integrate into the global economy and adopt best practices in corporate governance, the inclusion of employee voices, whether through formal board membership or other participatory mechanisms, could become a significant part of the corporate governance landscape.

#employeedirector #board #boardofdirectors #corporategovernance #employeerepresentative #labourcode #inclusiveboard